Submitted by The Investment Shadow
| RSS Feed
| Add Comment
| Bookmark Me!
Cruise Control Hedging: The Basics of Investing
Apart from the considerations discussed in the previous article, risk of loss in an equity investment is generally greater than risk of loss in any debt instrument. The potential reward from each is just the opposite, and that's where all the excitement begins.
Do we risk more to obtain a greater realized return, or do we risk less trying to preserve capital? Keep in mind that investment capital is a measure of cost, not of market value, and that the only real loss is a realized loss.
Typically, the older the investor, the more boring or income focused the portfolio should be --- minimizing the overall risk. But it's difficult to actively manage risk in "open end" mutual funds or unmanaged ETFs.
Risk minimization requires the identification of what's inside a portfolio. Risk control requires decision-making about the content. Risk management requires selection from a universe of securities that meet a known set of quality standards.
Product owners assume the added "fear and greed" risk of the general population, while fund mangers stand aside and mumble about the opportunities lost in either direction.
Without a risk sensitive menu to select from, 401k participants need to minimize risk by: avoiding the poor diversification that may be a requirement of their plan, and developing outside income portfolios with disposable income above the employer matching contribution.
The most important management action focused on risk minimization in any program is the asset allocation plan. The plan separates investment capital into two buckets (Equity and Income) based on cost, not market value. No portfolio should have less than 30% in the income bucket, 40% seems to be the most effective number, long term.
No investment plan should be developed "tax" or "cost" first. Risk minimization comes first, then tax minimization, if possible. Finally, transaction cost minimization may be considered only if you are qualified to run your program yourself.
A cost based asset allocation approach (Google "working capital model - Selengut") assures growing levels of "base income" throughout the portfolio development process and, possibly, into retirement. Income growth is the only real hedge against that other economic risk, inflation --- a buying power problem that has nothing to do with the market value of the income producing assets.
Minimizing investment risk is done best through the use of disciplined sets of rules for the various operations involved in managing a portfolio. Strict rules need to be developed for security selection, three types of diversification, income production, and profit taking.
Forget the Wall Street product menagerie. You needn't be interested in massaging market value to take the sting out of cyclical market change. The plan is to take advantage of these changes as they unwind around us over time, and when they occur unexpectedly, causing short-term disruptions and dislocations.
In the securities markets (stocks and bonds), the real risk of loss can be minimized without products and futures speculations, without commodities and hedge funds, and without the "ageda" most people experience throughout their investment lifetimes.
The old fashioned principles of investing: Quality, Diversification, and Income, plus disciplined, targeted, Profit Taking are the only hedges an investment portfolio needs to assure long-term productivity. Conveniently, QDI+PT applies equally well to both growth and income securities.
"Q" is for quality. If you study the long-term behavior of Investment Grade Value Stocks, and high quality income CEFs, you'll discover that they hedge themselves quite effectively.
Risk is wrung out of portfolios by investing only in S & P, B+ or better rated, dividend paying, and historically profitable companies and only when their prices are well below 52-week highs.
"D" is for diversification. Positions must never exceed 5% of total working capital (i.e., the total cost basis) and positions should never start at maximum exposure. You want to be able to buy more at lower prices.
Similar diversification rules apply to industry exposure and global diversification through the use of the mainly world class companies in the investment grade quality categories.
"I" is for income. Own no security that does not pay regular dividends or interest. Dividends are a quality indicator in equities. In the income "bucket", seek out above average yields while avoiding those that seem either too high or too low.
Managed closed end funds do it best and provide easy "PT" and "buy more" opportunities. Buy established CEFs with long term payment records.
"PT" is for profit taking. Absolutely always smile and take your profits willingly, net/net 7% to 10% (dependent upon available reinvestment possibilities and security class), and never, ever, look back. Trading this same body of securities, again and again, has been shown to sustain growth of capital and income consistently in a relatively low risk environment.
In the recent financial crisis, a very small percentage of (I bought my house to live in) homeowners stopped paying on their mortgages. Still, the hysteria over the bursting housing bubble (i.e., lower market values) led to financial institution road-kill because of ridiculous accounting rules.
When the dot-come bubble destroyed "new economy" gladiators in a gory spectacle destined to repeat itself over time, what investment portfolios cheered unscathed from the coliseum bleachers?
If you reduce the amount of betting in your portfolio (and throw out politicians who don't have a clue about the workings of free markets) you can safely navigate even the choppiest seas that the market, interest rate, and economic cycles roll your way.
The tide-like change of market values is the normal order of things, and until we embrace the cyclical nature of markets, all markets, our disappointment and disillusionment will continue. Portfolio market values will reflect where we are within the various cycles.
Interest rate sensitive securities (all bonds, government securities, preferred stocks, and relatively high dividend equities) vary inversely with interest rate expectations, most of the time.
Where we are in the interest rate cycle is fairly easy to determine, and you need to position yourself to take advantage of the higher rates that will sneak into the economic formula as the cycle moves further and further from its recent lows.
How do we prepare for higher interest rates? By designing the income bucket of the portfolio so that it refills itself with at least 30% of total portfolio realized income, and by owning income generating securities in a form that is easy to add to.
The next article presents ten, time-tested, live portfolio risk minimizers.
Click for Details --> Ten Risk Minimizers
Retirement Ready Income Programs
2971 Maritime Forest Drive
Johns Island, SC 29455
Phone (800) 245-0494 • Fax (843) 243-8509
Contact Steve directly for additional information: 800-245-0494
Please join the private article mailing list.
|Please read this disclaimer:|
Steve Selengut is registered as an investment adviser representative. His assessments and opinions are purely his own. None of the information presented here should be construed as an endorsement of any business entity; the information is only intended to be educational and thought provoking.
Risk Management: Income, 401k, and IRA Programs
Take a free tour of a professional investment managers' private SEP IRA program during ten years surrounding the financial crisis:
In developing the investment plan, personal financial goals, objectives, time frames, and future income requirements should all be considered. A first step would be to assure that small portfolios (under $50,000) are at least 50% income focused.
At the $100,000 level, between 30% and 40% income focused is fine, but above age 50, the income focus allocation needs to be no less than 40%... and it could increase in 10% increments every five years.
The "Income Bucket" of the Asset Allocation is itself a portfolio risk minimization tool, and when combined with an "Equity Bucket" that includes only Investment Grade Value Stocks, it becomes a very powerful risk regulator over the life of the portfolio.
Other Risk Minimizers include: "Working Capital Model" based Asset Allocation, fundamental quality based selection criteria, diversification and income production rules, and profit taking guidelines for all securities,
Dealing with changes in the Investment Environment productively involves a market/interest rate/economic cycle appreciation, as has evolved in the Market Cycle Investment Management (MCIM) methodology. Investors must formulate realistic expectations about investment securities--- by class and by type. This will help them deal more effectively with short term events, disruptions and dislocations.
Over the past twenty years, the market has transitioned into a "passive", more products than ever before, environment on the equity side... while income purpose investing has actually become much easier in the right vehicles. MCIM relies on income closed end funds to power our programs.
To illustrate just how powerful the combination of highest quality equities plus long term closed end funds has been during this time... we have provided an audio PowerPoint that illustrates the development of a Self Directed IRA portfolio from 2004 through 2014.
Throughout the years surrounding the "Financial Crisis", Annual income nearly tripled from $8,400 to $23,400 and Working Capital grew 80% $198,000 to $356,000.
Total income is 6.5% of capital and more than covers the RMD.
Managing income purpose securities requires price volatility understanding and disciplined income reinvestment protocals. "Total realized return" (emphasis on the realized) and compound earnings growth are the key elements. All forms of income secuities are liquid when dealt with in Closed End Funds.
|What Your Mother Never Told You About Income Investing: Twenty Questions (1 thru -
Investors are a very dependent group of people, particularly now that most employed persons have bee...|
|A Dark Future For IRAs and 401(k)s? -
Dr. Ghilarducci has presented a socialist solution to a problem that could easily be dealt with usin...|
|Who is Steve Selengut? -
Investment portfolio manager. BA Business, Gettysburg College, MBA, Professional Management, Pace Un...|
|Managing the Income Portfolio 101 -
The reason people assume the risks of investing in the first place is the prospect of achieving a hi...|
|Crisis Investing: Are YOU Ready? -
Why are investors afraid (shocked, confused, overwhelmed, angry) about stock market corrections? Her...|
|Asset Allocation Based Performance Analysis - One -
It matters not what lines, numbers, indices, or gurus you worship, you just can't know where the sto...|
|The Economic Impact Of Politics On Investing -
Just six short months from now we will be asked to elect a leader for the still most powerful econom...|
|WCM Investing - The Process (December 2008) -
Most people enter the investment process tip first. They hear something, grab an idea from a popular...|
|Retirement Ready Income Investing: What's In Your Wallet? -
What good is wealth without income? Your 401k program is NOT retirement ready... even the most popul...|
|Purpose Based Asset Allocation: The Working Capital Model -
Asset Allocation is an Investment Planning Tool, not an Investment Strategy. WCM facilitates long te...|
|Please read this disclaimer:|
Steve Selengut is registered as an investment advisor representative. His assessments and opinions are purely his own and do not represent the views of any other entity. None of his commentary is or should be considered either investment advice or a solicitation of business. Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be or should be construed as an endorsement of any entity or organization. The reader should not assume that any strategies, or investments mentioned are any more than illustrations --- they are never recommendations, and others will most certainly disagree with the thoughts presented in the article.